S &S Slides vs. Stainless Steel in cost, performace and durability.

S & S Slides vs. Stainless Steel There are several reasons to choose S & S Slides® over typical stainless steel alternatives. Lower Profile Greater Belt Entry Clearance Less Weight Faster Set-Up Times Equal Capacity Using 36" Belt Lower Friction Coefficient Less Power Consumption Versatility Faster Belt-Ups Cost - 36" Belt vs 42" Belt, Structure & Terminals	Typical RFM Long-John Structure 42" Belt Conveyor Cross-Sectional Area = 0.9028 sq. ft.

	S & S Continuous Haulage Structure36" Belt Conveyor Cross-Sectional Area = 0.9146 sq. ft.


S & S Slides® vs. Stainless Steel Amperage Test 75 H.P. Drive / 36" Belt	S & S Slides® vs. Stainless Steel Coefficient of Friction Test
S & S Slides® vs. Stainless Steel Energy Costs
Parameters: Loadrate ton/shift:450 Max. Conv. Lth. (ft.): 600 Conv. WT (lb/lf): 2 Prod. Shifts/Day: 3	Coefficient Friction: .42/.75 Conv. Vel. (fpm): 300 Max. Loadrate (tpm): 4 Power Cost ($/kwh): 0.08

S & S Slides^® Incorporated
11771 State Rt. 85 • Kittanning, PA 16201 • Tel: 724.545.2001 • Fax: 724.548.2009 • info@ssslides.com